An "Act of Parliament"?

According to reliable sources, grain farmers in the Province of Quebec who export grain have been permitted by the Government of Canada to export their grain in contravention of the Canadian Wheat Board Act, the Customs Act, and the Regulation Respecting the Reporting of Exported Goods without any sanctions like those being imposed in western Canada.

The decision by Ontario to begin issuing their own export licenses for wheat and barley grown in that province was no doubt prompted by the non-enforcement of the Customs Act and the Canadian Wheat Board Act in Quebec.

A recent request for information under the Access to Information Act revealed that there were no sanctions for any infractions of any act with respect to the export of wheat or barley at any of the border crossings in Quebec or Ontario.

Not so in the rest of Canada.  In a report to Howard Migie (AAFC) from Jon Dyck dated June 26, 1997 which included a report by Clyde Bond, DOJ (Crown Prosecutor), "Clyde noted that in Manitoba 62 people have been charged with offences related to the illegal export of grain, while in Saskatchewan, 123 individuals have been charged in eight separate incidents.  In Alberta, a total of 30 individuals had been charged in two separate incidents."  It sure makes on wonder that in one part of Canada one can be jailed while in another part individuals go "scott free" for the same activity.

A summary of the civil actions being taken by Customs and Revenue Canada at this point has also been report by Mike Hadley of Revenue Canada.  According to Hadley,

"of the 211 cases currently under appeal, approximately 170 involve criminal charges under the Customs Act of exporting without a license (s5) and failure to make a report in writing (s3).  The s5 charge of exporting without a license is, as a result of the Sawatsky decision, no longer valid.  This is problematic because the s3 (failure to report in writing) actions were added as an afterthought and have in many cases not been pursued i.e.. the defendants have not been given an opportunity to respond to these charges.

Additionally, warning letters by Customs had not specifically referred to a requirement to report in writing.  Consequently, there is now some question as to whether the s3 charge will stand up to a court challenged.  The difficulty with the s3 charge is that exactly what constitutes a report in writing has never been Gazetted or specified."

Even though the Crown describes their position as "problematic" they continue to pursue the charges.  At the same meeting, Cathy Pitfield, speaking on behalf of the CWB, "indicated that it's position (CWB) was that the integrity of the grain marketing system must be maintained and the the laws in question must be upheld."  Minister Goodale was to mouth those same sentiments a few days later that set in motion the continuance of persecution against farmers in the west.  Supporters of the Canadian Wheat Board like the grain Handlers Union, Railway Unions, the National Farmers Union, the Western Producer and the Saskatchewan Wheat Board were ecstatic.  Western grain farmers were now bound to the road to serfdom.

One of the defendants charged in Manitoba received the following interpretation from Revenue Canada representative N.L. Woram.  In his letter Woram declares, "The Canadian Wheat Board Act and regulations requires that exporters of wheat and barley obtain an export  license from the Canadian Wheat Board before such grain may be exported from Canada.  The Canadian Wheat Board regulations requires that the export permit be provided to Customs prior to the export of grain.  For Customs purposes the requirement to obtain an export license and provide it to Customs means that wheat and barley is controlled by an Act of Parliament."

No one in the west would wish our draconian system on our brothers and sisters in eastern Canada.  However, if an "Act of Parliament" means that laws are applied equally across the country, then the west should accept no less than the equality bestowed on Ontario and Quebec.

Ken Dillen
September 16, 2005

 

Designed & Maintained by www.familyfarmers.com