All Things Not Considered Equal

The Prairie Centre Policy Institute has reported on several occasions the inconsistency in the application of the Canadian Wheat Board Act in the rest of Canada, particularly Ontario and Quebec.

Alberta attempted to clarify whether the jurisdiction of the Canadian Wheat Board Act applied to the provinces by initiating a legal action which was called "Marketing Choice Program: Whether the Alberta Government Can Legally Facilitate the Export of Wheat and Barley."  This action was filed on July 22, 1996.

There was no legislation that would prevent provinces from exercising that right if they decided to market grain on behalf o their provincial farmers, just like Ontario is presently doing.  The Government of Canada and the CWB was sure they would lose this challenge, so they set out to amend the law by introducing Bill C-72.

According to a report entitled "Civil Cases Status Report (obtained under the Access to Information Act) which reported on the court challenge by Alberta, "...before the case was to be heard, however, Bill C-72, an Act to amend the Canadian Wheat Board Act was introduced in Parliament.  As this bill would have made the case moot, the case was held in abeyance pending the bills outcome.  Bill C-72 was not passed into law; it died on the order paper when a federal election was called on April 276, 1997.

Determined not to surrender the jurisdiction of the Canadian Wheat Board Act to the provinces, "the proposed legislation was resurrected, however, in the form of Bill C-4, which was introduced in the new session of Parliament on September 25, 1997."

The report continues:

Although the reference case was scheduled to be heard in Edmonton on November 24 - 28, 1997, on November 12, 1997 the court again postponed its hearing until the spring 1998, pending the fate of Bill C-4.  However, due to the delay of the passage of Bill C-4, the court re-considered this postponement on December 15, 1997 and set a hearing date for the case on April 7 - 9, 1998 in the Alberta Court of Appeal, based on the fact that Bill C-4 was under consideration by the Senate.

The adjournment was granted sine die (until further notice) by Justice Cote, meaning that the case was unlikely to be heard at all unless Bill C-4 was not passed into law or if it passed without clause 2 (making the CWB Act binding on a province) intact.

On June 11, 1998 Bill C-4 was passed by Parliament and received Royal Assent.

On July 22, 1998, legal council for Alberta filed Notice of Discontinuance of the Reference.  The Canadian Wheat Board jurisdiction is now firmly entrenched by an Act of Parliament to include all the provinces of Canada.

However, it would appear that Quebec and Ontario are the possible exception.  Quebec just ignores the CWB and Ontario will begin to issue its own export permits.  Meanwhile, western farmers get the heavy hand of government and leg irons and chains.  The road to serfdom is getting pretty crowded out here.

Ken Dillen
September 23, 2002

 

Designed & Maintained by www.familyfarmers.com